Loading previews...
good_bad_intro.pdf
Text
["licenses_imagelink_cc_by_nc_sa" not defined]
|
Download (265kB) |
bad_ind.pdf
Text
["licenses_imagelink_cc_by_nc_sa" not defined]
|
Download (349kB) |
bad_group.pdf
Text
["licenses_imagelink_cc_by_nc_sa" not defined]
|
Download (355kB) |
written_improvised.pdf
Text
["licenses_imagelink_cc_by_nc_sa" not defined]
|
Download (270kB) |
good_bad_intro.pdf (Text) | bad_ind.pdf (Text) | bad_group.pdf (Text) | written_improvised.pdf (Text) |
4 files in this resource
Identifying good and bad practice
The activities in this resource, like the peer review activities elsewhere in this collection, are designed to prompt individuals or groups to begin thinking critically about what makes a good lecture/lecturer. Included are a mock ‘bad’ lecture to evaluate and an exercise in self-reflection on your own methods of delivering a lecture—are you more comfortable using an improvisational technique or do you write your lectures out word for word?
Added By: | Mr Brett Lucas |
---|---|
Date Added: | 17 Jul 2011 19:20 |
Creators: | English Subject Centre |
Tags: | Ukoer, Oereng, Omac, Lectures, Oral Tradition, Teaching As Performance, Professional Development, PGCHE, English Literature |
Languages: | English |
Viewing permissions: | World |
URL: | http://humbox.edshare.ac.uk/id/eprint/2915 |
Downloads & Views |
Actions (login required)
View Item |